City Component

HillsboroOwnership Sustainability

Ownership Sustainability evaluates long-term carrying viability for resident households beyond initial purchase access.

Long-run ownership strain can rise from tax, insurance, and recurring carrying costs even when headline prices appear manageable.

Local Component Score

16

/100

Band: Critical

Comparative Context

State percentile: 33rd.

National percentile: 16th.

City ACS ownership carry profile with county labor-market context (2023, v2-acs-multipillar-seed).

What This Component Measures

Assesses whether residents can realistically maintain housing over time across cost escalation, tax pressure, insurance overlap, and distress trends.

Signal 1

Owner carrying-cost burden relative to local income levels.

Signal 2

Owner occupancy share and tenure durability context.

Signal 3

Expense escalation overlap across taxes, insurance, and maintenance pressure.

Signal 4

Distress-related pressure signals where available in standardized sources.

Interpretation And Questions

Interpretation

Higher scores indicate stronger long-term ownership viability.

Lower scores indicate elevated ongoing carrying-cost risk for residents.

Use trend direction to distinguish improving versus deteriorating ownership conditions.

Questions

Can households realistically maintain ownership long term?

Are recurring carrying costs becoming structurally burdensome?

How does local ownership viability compare with state and national peers?

Hillsboro Ownership Sustainability Score | HousingStabilityIQ